RESUMO
Background: The role of cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (mGISTs) responding to imatinib (IM) has not yet been established. We carried out a retrospective analysis of the outcomes of patients with mGISTs in two Russian cancer centers. We compared two cohorts: treated (Group S) or not treated with surgery (Group NS) after a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) while on IM. Methods: A total 44 patients treated by IM as first line treatment were included in our analysis. Prognostically similar patients only sensitive to IM cases with hepatic or peritoneal metastases as well as durable response to IM lasting more than 12 months were included in a control arm. Patients in Group NS received only IM until disease progression. Patients in Group S were treated additionally with metastasectomy after having response or SD on IM. Results: The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups with several trends: a higher proportion of patients achieved a PR in Group S (87% vs. 55%, P=0.165), and greater number of patients had peritoneal metastases in Group NS (45% vs. 27%, P=0.759). The median time to surgery from the initiation of IM was 8 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in Group S than Group NS: the median PFS was 78 vs. 35 months (P=0.088); the median OS was 141 vs. 80 months (P=0.154). Conclusions: The surgical resection of residual lesions after disease control with IM is likely to be beneficial to patients with mGISTs.
